St@teside
In This Issue
Commonwealth Fund Releases First State Scorecard June 2007
Finding large gaps in quality of care, access to care, avoidable hospitalizations and costs, equity, and healthy lives among states, the Commonwealth Fund’s scorecard is the first report of its kind to assess health system performance across these five dimensions on a state-by-state basis. Compared on 32 indicators across five dimensions, the report, Aiming Higher: Results from a State Scorecard on Health System Performance, finds that no single state performed at the top across all categories. However, some states far surpassed others. Hawaii, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine performed the best, while states in the South comprised most of the lowest-ranking states. The differences between the high-performing states and low-performing states were dramatic; often a two- to three-fold variation existed. The scorecard found that states performing highly on access to care, especially access to health insurance coverage, were more likely to rank highly on quality of care. Additionally, the scorecard did not find that states with higher costs were necessarily those with the highest quality. According to the report, some states are able to realize high quality at relatively low costs. States with the highest level of spending tended to have higher rates of preventable hospital use, including readmissions and admissions for diabetes, asthma, and other chronic conditions. According to the report, if all of the states performed at the level of the top tier of states, the nation could prevent substantial human and economic costs: 90,000 lives could be saved annually and 22 million additional adults and children could have health insurance. Medicare could save $22 billion annually if high cost states lowered spending levels to that of average states. Additional report findings: